The choice of
London Labour’s selectorate for our 2016 mayoral candidate has been announced,
and in a (partial) upset victory, its Sadiq
Khan.
I won’t lie
when I say my preference was Tessa Jowell, the one-time frontrunner for the nod
(I also very much liked David Lammy and attended a launch event of his back in
May, but he was always very much an underdog). Tessa had a good record managing
the 2012 Olympic bid and launching Sure Start in the last Labour government,
she was well-liked among Londoners and I also admired the fact that she stood
down from the Commons in order to commit herself fully to the mayoralty. I do
very much hope the party finds a place for her in the coming years, as Labour
has big fights ahead and will still need her talents.
Tessa’s
undoing was probably being tagged as the “Blairite”
candidate in the eyes of many of the affiliate union voters and £3 registered
supporters, while much of the enthusiasm from these two generally pro-Corbyn
groups in the selectorate trickled down-ballot to help Sadiq and Diane Abbott
(Abbott’s preferences then went to Sadiq in the final
round). As a result, many on the right of the party will be disappointed by
this result. But it is important not to overreact.
First, the
result takes some pressure off. If Jeremy Corbyn is elected leader today, on
top of his supporters helping to select Sadiq, the narrative will be that the
defeated “Blairites” have lost their influence in the party. This could make it
easier for modernisers to distance themselves, quietly regroup and avoid blame
for the consequences of a Corbyn leadership.
Second, Sadiq
was a close frontbench ally of Ed Miliband, with essentially soft-left social
democratic politics, and so the prophecies of doom from a few ultra-Blairites
and the Tory
chicken-counting that greeted his selection are both undue. Ed Miliband’s
leadership may have been a disaster for Labour nationally on May 7th,
but the party fared relatively well in London specifically. It’s also worth
remembering that Ken Livingstone, over on the hard-left of the party with Corbyn,
was able to get elected twice in London. Tessa might still have been a safer
bet to win the outer suburbs that sunk Livingstone in his last two bids for
mayor, especially with the Tories likely to pick a candidate able to make
inroads into Labour’s liberal central London stronghold in Zac Goldsmith, but
it’s far too soon to declare Sadiq “unelectable”.
Sadiq’s story
is an inspiring one. He was born into an immigrant family; the son of a bus
driver and a seamstress who grew up with seven siblings in a south London
council flat. From those beginnings, he worked his way up to become a successful
human rights lawyer, and was involved in landmark cases around discrimination
and policing before entering public life. Though Labour should probably resist
the temptation to try to dwell on the contrast with Goldsmith’s
Old Etonian background, Khan’s is a fitting narrative for a man who aspires
to be the executive of a great cosmopolitan city like our capital.
He also has
significant political acumen. He was first elected to parliament in 2005, but
he came to the fore in 2010, when his against-the-odds survival in Tooting and
the chants of “yes we
Khan!” at the count that night served as a symbol of the Tories’ failure to
secure their expected majority that year. Alongside his shadow Justice post
under Miliband, he was also shadow Minister for London, crafting Labour’s policies
for the city, and he oversaw the party’s 2015
effort in London, which saw seven seats gained and several Tory incumbents
knocked off.
His campaign
has been supported by voices from across the party – significantly, he was
joint-endorsed by Livingstone
and Oona King, and by Margaret Hodge, a high-profile supporter of Liz
Kendall in the leadership race. My local MP Emily
Thornberry (who backed Yvette Cooper for leader and Ben Bradshaw for
deputy) has also campaigned for him. And while I and others may have leaned to
Tessa on the logic that she would most be able to win,
Hodge and King made a convincing point in a recent New
Statesman article about Khan’s three wins in his marginal constituency (“Tooting
is a microcosm of London – with some areas of urban poverty with a large ethnic
minority population, but much of the constituency is leafy, suburban and
affluent”).
In terms of his vision for London, housing has
been a focus of Sadiq’s in the campaign, a major issue in the capital and a
source of generational anxiety that has led many young
people to back Corbyn in the leadership race. His ideas include a London
Living Rent, a 50% requirement for affordable
housing on new developments and a crackdown on ‘buy-to-leave’ homes. In
transport, a key mayoral responsibility, he will control
fares, battle the government on the third runway at
Heathrow and take more rail
services under TFL control. He has stressed tackling
extremism and rebuilding Labour’s tattered relationship with London’s
sizable Jewish
community (vital in light of some of the controversies that have dogged Corbyn). And he has made clear his intention to be a pro-worker,
pro-enterprise mayor, committed to a rise in the Living
Wage while aiming to be “the
most pro-business mayor London’s ever had” (Sadiq has noted that he ran a
successful law firm, taking it from two to 50 employees).
So whoever we backed for mayor, and whatever the outcome in the leader and deputy
leader elections, Labourites can all take heart from the selection of Sadiq. I
look forward to hitting the streets to campaign for him – we’ve only got eight
months to canvass a city of eight million, so there’s no time to waste if we
wish to take back the city we love for the party we love.
Comments
Post a Comment